If you've heard about the STR loophole,
here's the actual math at your tax bracket.
Most short-term rental loophole content runs on someone else's numbers. This tool runs on yours — your filing status, your state, your salary, your participation hours. See whether a short-term rental actually generates enough year-one paper losses to dent your tax bill.
The loophole in 90 seconds
You buy a rental property. The IRS lets you deduct depreciation — a paper expense that lowers your rental income on the books without costing cash.
The catch. Rental losses are "passive" by default: they offset other rental income, not your salary. A $25,000 special allowance phases out between $100,000 and $150,000 of household income; above that, ordinary rental losses can't help your paycheck tax.
The exception. If guests stay seven days or fewer on average, the IRS treats the property as a small business. Add 100+ hours of your own time (more than anyone helping), and the losses now offset salary, dollar for dollar.
The amplifier. Cost segregation reshuffles depreciation into shorter-life parts. Layered onto 100% bonus depreciation (permanent post-January 19, 2025), one property can throw off a six-figure first-year paper loss — tens of thousands off the tax bill at a high-earner bracket.
For tax pros: Treas. Reg. §1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii) (seven-day carve-out) + §1.469-5T (material participation). Separate from §469(c)(7), the Real Estate Professional rule. Plain-language entries in the glossary.
What it looks like at your bracket
A worked example for a real scenario the tool models in full. Your numbers are unique; this is just to show the shape of the math.
In a handful of states that don't follow the federal bonus-depreciation rules — California, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland are the big ones — state savings on the bonus portion are $0, and the first-year win drops correspondingly. The tool models that state by state.
Both numbers are after taxes — federal capital-gains tax, state tax, the 3.8% net-investment-income surtax, and (for the rental) the recapture you owe at sale on all that depreciation you took along the way. Same starting equity, same hold period, same tax bracket.
The catch
The loophole is real but narrower than most TikToks suggest. The four most common failure modes:
The loophole doesn't apply, but a rental can still beat the index
If you don't want to babysit guests and your tenants will stay longer than seven days, the seven-day carve-out doesn't help — you can't use rental losses to offset salary income above $150,000 of household income. But long-term rentals still work as tortoise-style wealth-building: tax-free cash flow during the hold, forced equity buildup as the tenant pays down the loan, and modest appreciation. Different pitch, different audience.
See the long-term-rental math →Built by a 2-person team who wants objective, cold, hard math.
We don't sell properties. We don't sell courses. We don't take referral fees. The output is one printable page you can take to your accountant — not a buy / no-buy verdict. The model handles passive-loss rules, the short-term rental loophole, the real-estate-professional rule, cost segregation, bonus depreciation, vacation-home limits, the three main exit strategies (sell, like-kind exchange, hold to inheritance), and a side-by-side after-tax comparison against an S&P 500 index fund held over the same number of years.
Independent — we don't sell courses or take referral fees. Estimates only. RE-Invest is not a licensed accounting, tax, or investment advisory service. The numbers above are illustrative — verify your own scenario with a licensed CPA before acting. Tax law changes; what works in 2026 may not work next year.